Ukraine 'violated Tymoshenko rights'

Yulia Tymoshenko in court in Kiev, 24 June 2011Tymoshenko was ordered to spend her trial in custody for contempt of court

Ukraine’s pre-trial detention of ex-Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko in 2011 was “arbitrary and unlawful” and her right to a legal review was violated, European judges have ruled.

Tymoshenko, who is still in jail, also alleged physical mistreatment, but that complaint was not upheld by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

She was jailed for seven years for abuse of office over a gas deal.

Tuesday’s verdict does not overturn her prison sentence.

The ECHR will examine that verdict later, in a separate case.

According to the Associated Press, a Ukrainian government official stormed out of the courtroom after Tuesday’s ruling.

The judgment is not final as the parties involved have three months to lodge any appeal.

Tymoshenko and her supporters accuse her long-time political opponent, President Viktor Yanukovych, of orchestrating the trial as an act of political revenge.

‘No risk’

Tymoshenko was a key figure in Ukraine’s 2004 Orange Revolution and went on to become prime minister twice.

In 2009, she signed a 10-year contract for the supply of Russian gas to Ukraine.

At her trial two years later, prosecutors argued that she had not obtained the approval of her cabinet to sign the deal, and that it had proved ruinous for the Ukrainian economy.

The Strasbourg-based ECHR found that Tymoshenko’s detention ahead of her trial had violated her right to liberty and security because it had been ordered for an indefinite period of time.

“No risk of absconding was discernible,” it said, noting that the former prime minister had not breached her obligation not to leave town or failed to attend a court hearing.

The Ukrainian trial judge, Rodion Kireyev, had ordered her to spend the trial in custody for contempt of court.

However, the ECHR judges ruled that this “reason was not included among those which would justify deprivation of liberty”.

While not ruling explicitly that her detention had been politically motivated, the ECHR noted that Tymoshenko had accused the authorities of detaining her to remove her from political life.

She had been detained, the ECHR concluded, “for other reasons” than ensuring she would appear before the judge.

The court in Strasbourg also ruled that Ukraine’s judiciary lacked a procedure for reviewing the detention of suspects.

Complaints rejected

A complaint that Tymoshenko had been denied proper medical treatment in detention was thrown out by the ECHR judges.

On the contrary, they found that the local authorities “had invested efforts far beyond the normal healthcare arrangements available for ordinary detainees in Ukraine”.

They also threw out an allegation that Tymoshenko had been beaten during a transfer from prison to hospital in April 2012, pointing out that she had refused to undergo a full forensic examination at the time.

Though the ECHR did not rule on the legality of Tymoshenko’s actual conviction, her daughter Yevgenia hailed the verdict as the “first victory” on the way to her release.

“Today we are saying that this is the first victory, the first step to her full political rehabilitation and her immediate release,” she told reporters in the Ukrainian capital, Kiev.

Powered by WPeMatico

Show Buttons
Hide Buttons
error: Content is protected !!